<?xml version="1.0" encoding="us-ascii" ?>
<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel><title>Mick Moignard's Blog | Comments</title><description>Mick on Lotus Notes, DCC in Model Railroading, and anything else I care to write about. </description><link>http://www.MickMoignard.com/MickMoignard/mickmoignard.nsf/</link><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:42:20 AM -0500</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<title>UK Post Office still losing its way</title>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:42:20 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>UK Post Office still losing its way</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Mick, <br /><br />I have a similar issue with UPS, 3 time they had to deliver a package, I was in the house on all occasions, and not once did the door bell ring. I finally managed to get the package by following the driver to his next stop - not kidding! <br /><br />I guess door bell identification is not of the list of required skill for delivery drivers...<br /><br />Can you get them to send the parcel to the "local" post office?]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Mick, <br /><br />I have a similar issue with UPS, 3 time they had to deliver a package, I was in the house on all occasions, and not once did the door bell ring. I finally managed to get the package by following the driver to his next stop - not kidding! <br /><br />I guess door bell identification is not of the list of required skill for delivery drivers...<br /><br />Can you get them to send the parcel to the "local" post office?]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.MickMoignard.com/MickMoignard/mickmoignard.nsf/dx/22022010164103MMOMKQ.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#23022010104220HOSMLH.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lotus Symphony 3: first look and a pleasant surprise. </title>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 04:00:50 PM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Mick Moignard</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Lotus Symphony 3: first look and a pleasant surprise. </dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[File Navigator plugin: use it all the time.<br /><br />Mick]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[File Navigator plugin: use it all the time.<br /><br />Mick]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.MickMoignard.com/MickMoignard/mickmoignard.nsf/dx/11022010095523MMODN6.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#02112010040050PMHOSTTK.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lotus Symphony 3: first look and a pleasant surprise. </title>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:36:11 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Christian Tillmanns</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Lotus Symphony 3: first look and a pleasant surprise. </dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Have you ever tried the File Navigator plugin for Notes? Drag the email to the file system and then send the .eml file. Works like a charm even on the mac.<br /><br />Cheers<br /><br />Cti]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Have you ever tried the File Navigator plugin for Notes? Drag the email to the file system and then send the .eml file. Works like a charm even on the mac.<br /><br />Cheers<br /><br />Cti]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.MickMoignard.com/MickMoignard/mickmoignard.nsf/dx/11022010095523MMODN6.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#11.02.2010103611HOSMGN.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lotus Symphony 3: first look and a pleasant surprise. </title>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 07:20:41 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Sjaak Ursinus</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Lotus Symphony 3: first look and a pleasant surprise. </dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Hoping with you !!!!!]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hoping with you !!!!!]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.MickMoignard.com/MickMoignard/mickmoignard.nsf/dx/11022010095523MMODN6.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#02112010072041AMHOSHNG.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Error in Notes Upgrade to 8.5.1 FP1</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:10:34 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Mick Moignard</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Error in Notes Upgrade to 8.5.1 FP1</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Hmm. My only suggestion would be to reinstall the 8.5.1 client, and check that it works properly, and then to install the Fixpack on top of it, after a reboot and before starting Notes. <br /><br />If that doesn't work, ask a question in the 8.5 Developer Forum on LDD/Notesnet, and/or raise a PMR.<br /><br />Mick]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hmm. My only suggestion would be to reinstall the 8.5.1 client, and check that it works properly, and then to install the Fixpack on top of it, after a reboot and before starting Notes. <br /><br />If that doesn't work, ask a question in the 8.5 Developer Forum on LDD/Notesnet, and/or raise a PMR.<br /><br />Mick]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.MickMoignard.com/MickMoignard/mickmoignard.nsf/dx/02022010121012MMOGAG.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#11022010101034MMODXP.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Error in Notes Upgrade to 8.5.1 FP1</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 02:49:10 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>benoit</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Error in Notes Upgrade to 8.5.1 FP1</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Hi,<br /><br />same error here, but nothing works for this update.<br /><br />I've killed everything related to lotus and i even rebooted the computer.<br /><br />the error is still here.<br /><br />any advice ?]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi,<br /><br />same error here, but nothing works for this update.<br /><br />I've killed everything related to lotus and i even rebooted the computer.<br /><br />the error is still here.<br /><br />any advice ?]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.MickMoignard.com/MickMoignard/mickmoignard.nsf/dx/02022010121012MMOGAG.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#11022010024910HOSCCS.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Blackberry vs Traveler</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Feb 2010 03:35:20 PM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Peter Meuser</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Blackberry vs Traveler</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[I forget the only advantage of the iPhone in the yellow cloud at the moment: You can use every Notes app on it without any modification! And I am not speaking about those ones with a web interface. Even the Eclipse based Standard client runs smoothly on it... The magic is done by Citrix XenApp. But at least the BB client doing the same should be already out since December...]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I forget the only advantage of the iPhone in the yellow cloud at the moment: You can use every Notes app on it without any modification! And I am not speaking about those ones with a web interface. Even the Eclipse based Standard client runs smoothly on it... The magic is done by Citrix XenApp. But at least the BB client doing the same should be already out since December...]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.MickMoignard.com/MickMoignard/mickmoignard.nsf/dx/08022010120132MMOG4Z.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#08.02.2010153520HOSTBM.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Blackberry vs Traveler</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Feb 2010 03:24:06 PM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Peter Meuser</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Blackberry vs Traveler</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[I am working with both of them on a daily base. iPhone (latest Traveler version) in the left hand, Bold 9000 (BES 5/OS5) in the right hand. I know this sounds strange but is the only way to get the whole picture for my clients. <br /><br />Just some remarks:<br /><br />- iPhone/Traveler allows access to the corporate directory (I tried it with about 80000 name entries.)<br /><br />- BES allows an additional remote full text search through your mailbox and limited (filesize!) access to smb shares<br /><br />All in all it's comparing different fruits with each other: BB is the ultimate tool to get your business tasks done, where as the iPhone is the much better playground. Just try to do some serious phone calls with iPhone, look for all conversations with a specific contact or find and schedule a free time slot for a meeting. You will love the BB. But yes, my children love the cool games on the iPhone much more than those of the BB.<br /><br />If the smartphones have to be supported by an it crowed, you will not bother with the iPhone either (as the other posts already pointed out).<br /><br />If your client want to have the shining iPhone, he will get it anyway. Don't forget to buy him an Otterbox (the shiny skin of the iPhone will not last very long in the typical business use...). I personal like the iPhone @home, because there it controly my TV (eyeTV) and my music collection (iTunes)... But this should not be an argument for a business decision.<br /><br />Cheers.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I am working with both of them on a daily base. iPhone (latest Traveler version) in the left hand, Bold 9000 (BES 5/OS5) in the right hand. I know this sounds strange but is the only way to get the whole picture for my clients. <br /><br />Just some remarks:<br /><br />- iPhone/Traveler allows access to the corporate directory (I tried it with about 80000 name entries.)<br /><br />- BES allows an additional remote full text search through your mailbox and limited (filesize!) access to smb shares<br /><br />All in all it's comparing different fruits with each other: BB is the ultimate tool to get your business tasks done, where as the iPhone is the much better playground. Just try to do some serious phone calls with iPhone, look for all conversations with a specific contact or find and schedule a free time slot for a meeting. You will love the BB. But yes, my children love the cool games on the iPhone much more than those of the BB.<br /><br />If the smartphones have to be supported by an it crowed, you will not bother with the iPhone either (as the other posts already pointed out).<br /><br />If your client want to have the shining iPhone, he will get it anyway. Don't forget to buy him an Otterbox (the shiny skin of the iPhone will not last very long in the typical business use...). I personal like the iPhone @home, because there it controly my TV (eyeTV) and my music collection (iTunes)... But this should not be an argument for a business decision.<br /><br />Cheers.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.MickMoignard.com/MickMoignard/mickmoignard.nsf/dx/08022010120132MMOG4Z.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#08.02.2010152406HOST4M.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Blackberry vs Traveler</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Feb 2010 10:51:40 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Daniel Lieber</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Blackberry vs Traveler</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[I have not seen a detailed functional comparison matrix for Traveler vs. BES. We utilize both. There are a few major factors to consider as to what you want to support:<br /><br />1) BES calendaring allows remote directory and free-time lookups for meetings from the BB device; I have not seen this on Traveler yet.<br /><br />2) BES has extremely strong centralized device control, e.g. you have explicit control over nearly everything on the device.<br /><br />3) Traveler allows for much larger device choice. The iPhone in particular has a fanatical following due to its ease-of-use.<br /><br />4) The core functions of basic secured messaging (send/receive), over-the-air calendar syncing, and over-the-air contacts syncing (the 3 most used components) are very similar.<br /><br />There are also third-party applications that compete with Traveler and provide more functionality for some devices. The key decisions seem to be based around support:<br /><br />- Will there be corporate control on device choice (if so, what are the choices and why? The business logic is very important as the life cycle of a given model in the mobile market is very short).<br /><br />- Who is responsible for supporting the device vs. services (carrier, corporate help desk, etc.)<br /><br />- What tools are available to assist in support (there are a variety of third-party vendors who provide remote control access for many devices)<br /><br />- What happens during user separation/termination/etc. Who owns the device, data, etc.?<br /><br />I hope this helps!]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I have not seen a detailed functional comparison matrix for Traveler vs. BES. We utilize both. There are a few major factors to consider as to what you want to support:<br /><br />1) BES calendaring allows remote directory and free-time lookups for meetings from the BB device; I have not seen this on Traveler yet.<br /><br />2) BES has extremely strong centralized device control, e.g. you have explicit control over nearly everything on the device.<br /><br />3) Traveler allows for much larger device choice. The iPhone in particular has a fanatical following due to its ease-of-use.<br /><br />4) The core functions of basic secured messaging (send/receive), over-the-air calendar syncing, and over-the-air contacts syncing (the 3 most used components) are very similar.<br /><br />There are also third-party applications that compete with Traveler and provide more functionality for some devices. The key decisions seem to be based around support:<br /><br />- Will there be corporate control on device choice (if so, what are the choices and why? The business logic is very important as the life cycle of a given model in the mobile market is very short).<br /><br />- Who is responsible for supporting the device vs. services (carrier, corporate help desk, etc.)<br /><br />- What tools are available to assist in support (there are a variety of third-party vendors who provide remote control access for many devices)<br /><br />- What happens during user separation/termination/etc. Who owns the device, data, etc.?<br /><br />I hope this helps!]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.MickMoignard.com/MickMoignard/mickmoignard.nsf/dx/08022010120132MMOG4Z.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#02082010105140AMHOSMSC.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Blackberry vs Traveler</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Feb 2010 10:45:58 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Daniel Lieber</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Blackberry vs Traveler</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[I have not seen a detailed functional comparison matrix for Traveler vs. BES. We utilize both. There are a few major factors to consider as to what you want to support:<br /><br />1) BES calendaring allows remote directory and free-time lookups for meetings from the BB device; I have not seen this on Traveler yet.<br /><br />2) BES has extremely strong centralized device control, e.g. you have explicit control over nearly everything on the device.<br /><br />3) Traveler allows for much larger device choice. The iPhone in particular has a fanatical following due to its ease-of-use.<br /><br />4) The core functions of basic secured messaging (send/receive), over-the-air calendar syncing, and over-the-air contacts syncing (the 3 most used components) are very similar.<br /><br />There are also third-party applications that compete with Traveler and provide more functionality for some devices. The key decisions seem to be based around support:<br /><br />- Will there be corporate control on device choice (if so, what are the choices and why? The business logic is very important as the life cycle of a given model in the mobile market is very short).<br /><br />- Who is responsible for supporting the device vs. services (carrier, corporate help desk, etc.)<br /><br />- What tools are available to assist in support (there are a variety of third-party vendors who provide remote control access for many devices)<br /><br />- What happens during user separation/termination/etc. Who owns the device, data, etc.?<br /><br />I hope this helps!]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I have not seen a detailed functional comparison matrix for Traveler vs. BES. We utilize both. There are a few major factors to consider as to what you want to support:<br /><br />1) BES calendaring allows remote directory and free-time lookups for meetings from the BB device; I have not seen this on Traveler yet.<br /><br />2) BES has extremely strong centralized device control, e.g. you have explicit control over nearly everything on the device.<br /><br />3) Traveler allows for much larger device choice. The iPhone in particular has a fanatical following due to its ease-of-use.<br /><br />4) The core functions of basic secured messaging (send/receive), over-the-air calendar syncing, and over-the-air contacts syncing (the 3 most used components) are very similar.<br /><br />There are also third-party applications that compete with Traveler and provide more functionality for some devices. The key decisions seem to be based around support:<br /><br />- Will there be corporate control on device choice (if so, what are the choices and why? The business logic is very important as the life cycle of a given model in the mobile market is very short).<br /><br />- Who is responsible for supporting the device vs. services (carrier, corporate help desk, etc.)<br /><br />- What tools are available to assist in support (there are a variety of third-party vendors who provide remote control access for many devices)<br /><br />- What happens during user separation/termination/etc. Who owns the device, data, etc.?<br /><br />I hope this helps!]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.MickMoignard.com/MickMoignard/mickmoignard.nsf/dx/08022010120132MMOG4Z.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#02082010104558AMHOSMNS.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Blackberry vs Traveler</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Feb 2010 06:46:31 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Werner Motzet</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Blackberry vs Traveler</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Hallo <br /><br />there is no way from Traveler to BBs.<br /><br />But you can get a free Licence for 10 BBs and 1 BES from IBM. <br /><br />Kind Regards Werner]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hallo <br /><br />there is no way from Traveler to BBs.<br /><br />But you can get a free Licence for 10 BBs and 1 BES from IBM. <br /><br />Kind Regards Werner]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.MickMoignard.com/MickMoignard/mickmoignard.nsf/dx/08022010120132MMOG4Z.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#08.02.2010064631HOSGZ5.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Error in Notes Upgrade to 8.5.1 FP1</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 Feb 2010 04:59:54 PM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Stuart Bogom</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Error in Notes Upgrade to 8.5.1 FP1</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[I just had this happen for the first time. I was updating the client software on a Notes server....I've updated half a dozen regular clients without a problem. Also, cannot locate an update.log file to try and diagnose.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I just had this happen for the first time. I was updating the client software on a Notes server....I've updated half a dozen regular clients without a problem. Also, cannot locate an update.log file to try and diagnose.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.MickMoignard.com/MickMoignard/mickmoignard.nsf/dx/02022010121012MMOGAG.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#02042010045954PMHOSUYH.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>See also....SmartUpgrading 8.5.1 FP1</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 Feb 2010 14:02:58 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Mick Moignard</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Error in Notes Upgrade to 8.5.1 FP1</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Marc Champoux explains here: http://www.thenewdominoadmin.com/blog/?p=713&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheNewDominoAdmin+%28The+New+Domino+Admin%29 how to use SmartUpgrade to distribute 8.5.1 FP1. Take a look.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Marc Champoux explains here: http://www.thenewdominoadmin.com/blog/?p=713&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheNewDominoAdmin+%28The+New+Domino+Admin%29 how to use SmartUpgrade to distribute 8.5.1 FP1. Take a look.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.MickMoignard.com/MickMoignard/mickmoignard.nsf/dx/02022010121012MMOGAG.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#04022010140258MMOJGY.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Error in Notes Upgrade to 8.5.1 FP1</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 Feb 2010 07:51:58 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Mick Moignard</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Error in Notes Upgrade to 8.5.1 FP1</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Werner<br /><br />Thanks for the links; however, the error I had was a different one, not the versions check. <br /><br />Mick]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Werner<br /><br />Thanks for the links; however, the error I had was a different one, not the versions check. <br /><br />Mick]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.MickMoignard.com/MickMoignard/mickmoignard.nsf/dx/02022010121012MMOGAG.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#02042010075158AMHOSJA2.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Error in Notes Upgrade to 8.5.1 FP1</title>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Feb 2010 01:55:06 PM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Werner Motzet</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Error in Notes Upgrade to 8.5.1 FP1</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Hello,<br /><br />this is documentated on different places in the web. One ofe the english is:<br /><br />{ <a href="http://dpastov.blogspot.com/2010/01/error-version-mismatch-expected-to-find.html" target="_blank" title="Link: dpastov.blogspot.com/2010/01/error-version-mismatch-expected-to-find.html">Link</a> }<br /><br />If you understand german, see here: { <a href="http://atnotes.de/index.php/topic,47537.0.html" target="_blank" title="Link: atnotes.de/index.php/topic,47537.0.html">Link</a> }<br /><br />Kind Regards Werner]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hello,<br /><br />this is documentated on different places in the web. One ofe the english is:<br /><br />{ <a href="http://dpastov.blogspot.com/2010/01/error-version-mismatch-expected-to-find.html" target="_blank" title="Link: dpastov.blogspot.com/2010/01/error-version-mismatch-expected-to-find.html">Link</a> }<br /><br />If you understand german, see here: { <a href="http://atnotes.de/index.php/topic,47537.0.html" target="_blank" title="Link: atnotes.de/index.php/topic,47537.0.html">Link</a> }<br /><br />Kind Regards Werner]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.MickMoignard.com/MickMoignard/mickmoignard.nsf/dx/02022010121012MMOGAG.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#02.02.2010135506HOSRCZ.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Kennedy Space Centre - such a disappointment</title>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 10:48:03 PM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ian Randall</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Kennedy Space Centre - such a disappointment</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[I recently attended a conference (in Australia) where a senior NASA Project Manager was presenting on the topic of risk management. He mentioned in passing that as the current generation of shuttles where designed in the mid to late 1970's, and mostly were designed to use Intel 8088, 286 & 386 processors. <br /><br />As a result, NASA was having some trouble sourcing spare parts from e-Bay for such obsolete technology. So if you were hoping to also see NASA promoting state-of-the art in rocket science, you would also be somewhat dissapointed.<br /><br />Until, the US Government makes a commitment to a permanent Lunar base or a trip to Mars, the days of the Right Stuff will be simply something that Generation X & Y regard as old farts taking about ancient stuff that happened last century.<br /><br />Ian]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I recently attended a conference (in Australia) where a senior NASA Project Manager was presenting on the topic of risk management. He mentioned in passing that as the current generation of shuttles where designed in the mid to late 1970's, and mostly were designed to use Intel 8088, 286 & 386 processors. <br /><br />As a result, NASA was having some trouble sourcing spare parts from e-Bay for such obsolete technology. So if you were hoping to also see NASA promoting state-of-the art in rocket science, you would also be somewhat dissapointed.<br /><br />Until, the US Government makes a commitment to a permanent Lunar base or a trip to Mars, the days of the Right Stuff will be simply something that Generation X & Y regard as old farts taking about ancient stuff that happened last century.<br /><br />Ian]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.MickMoignard.com/MickMoignard/mickmoignard.nsf/dx/24012010175022MMONX2.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#24012010104803PMHOS7N4.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Too Many MX records?</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 03:42:12 PM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>John D&#8217;Agostino</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Too Many MX records?</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Any solution to this? We are switching over to MessageLabs and are experiencing the exact same issue.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Any solution to this? We are switching over to MessageLabs and are experiencing the exact same issue.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.MickMoignard.com/MickMoignard/mickmoignard.nsf/dx/13112009085948MMOCKG.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#01132010034212PMHOSTFX.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Too Many MX records?</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Dec 2009 05:15:53 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Steve Knight</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Too Many MX records?</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[I get the same on customer's pair of R7.0.3 servers... originally thought to be communication issue as they had problems with their internet connection but proved to be the same. <br /><br />An R8.x server seems OK with cluster8out.eu.messagelabs.com so have just added specific hosts from the messagelabs cluster as the relay server for now.<br /><br />If anyone has come up with a fix for R7 servers and this issue please let me know!<br /><br />Steve]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I get the same on customer's pair of R7.0.3 servers... originally thought to be communication issue as they had problems with their internet connection but proved to be the same. <br /><br />An R8.x server seems OK with cluster8out.eu.messagelabs.com so have just added specific hosts from the messagelabs cluster as the relay server for now.<br /><br />If anyone has come up with a fix for R7 servers and this issue please let me know!<br /><br />Steve]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.MickMoignard.com/MickMoignard/mickmoignard.nsf/dx/13112009085948MMOCKG.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#07122009051553HOSF8G.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#64;Round XPage/JavaScript bug?</title>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:27:33 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Frank vd Linden</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>&#64;Round XPage/JavaScript bug?</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[@4: in Javascript there is for a Number two methods, toFixed() and toPrecision().<br /><br />I have used toFixed() recently to manage the display of a number value.<br /><br />See { <a href="http://www.w3schools.com/jsref/jsref_obj_number.asp" target="_blank" title="Link: www.w3schools.com/jsref/jsref_obj_number.asp">Link</a> }]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[@4: in Javascript there is for a Number two methods, toFixed() and toPrecision().<br /><br />I have used toFixed() recently to manage the display of a number value.<br /><br />See { <a href="http://www.w3schools.com/jsref/jsref_obj_number.asp" target="_blank" title="Link: www.w3schools.com/jsref/jsref_obj_number.asp">Link</a> }]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.MickMoignard.com/MickMoignard/mickmoignard.nsf/dx/20112009101710MMOE3T.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#11202009082733AMHOSJYA.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#64;Round XPage/JavaScript bug?</title>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:00:42 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Mick Moignard</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>&#64;Round XPage/JavaScript bug?</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[@3: Frank - that's the very eOffice post I mentioned....<br /><br />@1 and @2: yes, and I considered Math.round, but the real issue is that the SSJS @Round doesn't work properly.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[@3: Frank - that's the very eOffice post I mentioned....<br /><br />@1 and @2: yes, and I considered Math.round, but the real issue is that the SSJS @Round doesn't work properly.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.MickMoignard.com/MickMoignard/mickmoignard.nsf/dx/20112009101710MMOE3T.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#11202009080042AMHOSJFH.htm</link>
</item>

</channel></rss>
